QYLD vs SPYI: ETF Comparison
Compare QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Sep 15, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
QYLD vs SPYI: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, SPYI holds a clear edge over QYLD: +15.2% per year vs +8.8% per year — a gap of 6.3 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Keep the track records in mind: QYLD has been trading for 12.8 years, while SPYI has only 4.0 years of history. A shorter track record means the younger fund's average has been shaped by fewer market environments — one strong or weak stretch moves the needle more.
QYLD vs SPYI Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLD | Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | Global X | 12/12/2013 | 12.8y | +194.0% | +8.8% | 12.4% | 0.60% | B |
| SPYI | NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | NEOS | 8/30/2022 | 4.0y | +77.0% | +15.2% | 12.04% | 0.68% | B |
QYLD vs SPYI — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, QYLD or SPYI?
By average annual total return since inception, SPYI holds a clear edge over QYLD (+15.2% vs +8.8% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between QYLD and SPYI?
QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) is offered by Global X and currently yields 12.4%. SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) is offered by NEOS and yields 12.04%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +8.8% and +15.2% respectively.
Does SPYI pay a higher dividend than QYLD?
SPYI currently yields 12.04% and QYLD yields 12.4%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.