PDI vs QYLD: ETF Comparison
Compare PDI (PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund) and QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Sep 15, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
PDI vs QYLD: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, PDI is virtually tied with QYLD — +9.2% vs +8.8%. With a gap this small, the deciding factors are more likely to be yield, payout schedule, and how each strategy fits your goals than raw performance.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: PDI currently yields 16.10% vs QYLD's 12.4%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
PDI vs QYLD Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDI | PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | Pimco | 5/25/2012 | 14.3y | +252.0% | +9.2% | 16.10% | 1.10% | C |
| QYLD | Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | Global X | 12/12/2013 | 12.8y | +194.0% | +8.8% | 12.4% | 0.60% | B |
PDI vs QYLD — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, PDI or QYLD?
By average annual total return since inception, PDI is virtually tied with QYLD (+9.2% vs +8.8% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between PDI and QYLD?
PDI (PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund) is offered by Pimco and currently yields 16.10%. QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) is offered by Global X and yields 12.4%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +9.2% and +8.8% respectively.
Does PDI pay a higher dividend than QYLD?
PDI currently yields 16.10% and QYLD yields 12.4%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.